Sir Christopher Wren and Freemasonry: New Evidence

Sir Christopher Wren and Freemasonry: New Evidence

By Bros. Bernard Williamson and Michael Baigent
Originally presented Summer 1996.

A search through the archives of the Royal Society has provided us with new
information regarding the claim that Sir Christopher Wren was initiated into
Freemasonry in London on May 18th 1691. This claim was advanced in a handwritten
note added to the manuscript of John Aubrey's Naturall Historie of Wiltshire,
1685 now in the Bodleian library at Oxford. This manuscript is in two parts,
bound and filed separately as MS AUBREY 1 and MS AUBREY 2. In the second part a
short account of Freemasonry appears:

"Sir William Dugdale told me many years since, that about Henry the third's
time, the Pope gave a bull, or diploma ['patents' added above] to a company of
Italian Architects ['Freemasons' added above] to travel up and down and over
Europe, to build churches. From those derived the Fraternity of Free Masons
[adopted masons added above]. They are known to one and another by certain signs
& ['marks' erased] and watch words: it continues to this day. They have several
Lodges in several Countries for their reception: and when any of them fall into
decay, the brotherhood is to relieve him & c. The manner of their adoption is
very formal, and with an oath of secrecy."

The page to the left of this account was originaly left blank and on this page,
at some later time, were added three additional notes in Aubrey's own hand. One
of these notes concerns Freemasonry. It reads thus:

"MDM, this day ( may 1691 the 18th. Being Monday after Rogation Sunday) is a
great convention at St. Pauls' church of the fraternity of the Accepted[ 'free'
being struck out] masons where Sir Christopher Wren is to be adopted a brother:
and Sir Henry Goodric of ye tower, & divers ['several' being struck out] others
- and there have been kings, that have been of this -Sodalitie."

Of those who have studied the text, Clarke in ARS Quatour Coronatorum, 1965,
concluded that Wren was "almost certainly a freemason. John Hamill, in 1986, in
his book "THE CRAFT," is more cautious, concluding that however possible it
might be, "it is not proven". As we will show, the text can now be accorded a
greater degree of veracity. To understand this it is necessary to look at the
history of John Aubrey's manuscript.

John Aubrey's Manuscript.

John Aubrey, who lived 1626 to 1697 was one of the founding members of the Royal
Society, being recorded in the list of Fellows May 20th 1663. In 1685 he wrote
his Naturall Historie of Wiltshire, It was never published but remained in
manuscript form. However, the Royal Society so admired his work, and felt that
it was of such value to Fellows, that an official copy was ordered and made for
the societies archives in order that Fellows would not have to travel to Oxford
to consult it. Dr. Michael Hunter, in his biography of John Aubrey wrote:

"Above all, the Royal Society did Aubrey the honour of having a transcript made
of his Naturall Historie of Wiltshire in 1690-1, a unique and extraordinary
gesture showing their esteem for it, which cost them the considerable sum of
seven pounds.(832.64 in 2001)"

The Clerk of the Royal Society, Mr. B. G. Cramer who, in 1690, began the task
and completed it by mid 1691, made this copy, which is still in the archives of
the Royal Society. It is listed as MISC. Ms 92, and it runs to 373 pages.

When Cramer was ordered to produce this copy Aubrey took the opportunity to make
many additions and emendations and he oversaw their inclusion into the new text.
This is indicated by a short note, in Aubrey's own hand, attached to folio 124a.
of part two of the original manuscript: Aubrey writes, referring to a printed
pamphlet on wool which has been appended:

" Mr Cramer! As to this Treatise of wool, transcribe only the presentment of the
grand jury at Brewton in Somersetshire"

When Aubrey had written the original manuscript he had written only on the first
page of each leaf. In consequence, a blank page appears to the left of each page
of text. On this blank page are written the additions and emendations relating
to the text on the right. It can be supposed that all these changes were made
for the purpose of Cramer's new copy, but we cannot be absolutely certain of
this. We can say however, that Cramer included them in his new copy. In his
copy, Cramer included the following in the main body of text:

"Memorandum. This day ( may the 18th. Being Munday 1691 after Rogation Sunday0
is a great convention at St. Paul's church of the fraternity of the Adopted
Masons: where Sir Christopher Wren is to be adopted a Brother: and Sir Henry
Goodric of the tower & divers others. There have been Kings, that have been of
this Sodality."

We can, therefore, accept that Aubrey, Wren and the Royal Society agreed with
this addition citing Wren's initiation into Freemasonry. It seems reasonable to
accept it as a truthful statement.

John Aubrey was a close friend of Sir Christopher Wren. Both were in the Royal
Society, Wren had been a founding member of the Society and served as its
president from 1680-2. He was still alive and active in the society in 1691, the
date of Cramer's copy. It has been suggested that perhaps Wren intended to be
initiated but on the day he was unable to attend. However, on the 18th. May
1691, the date of the initiation and the date of the additional text relating to
Freemasonry, Cramer would have still been working on earlier pages of his copy.
Given that the date is written on the day in question and that Cramer Copied
this page at a later date, after the fact, there was ample time to amend the
text to reflect any variation on the planned event. That this was not done is
good evidence that Wren did not miss his 'adoption'.

In Conclusion, given that none of these men objected to this statement, nor
altered it after the event but prior to the coping, we can accept that it
records a real occurrence. We can be confident that Sir Christopher Wren was
indeed initiated into Freemasonry in 1691. We should like to thank the librarian
and staff of both the Royal Society and the Bodleian Library for their help in
making these manuscripts available to us.